Bill would require project site inspection
The successful appeal of a Planning Department decision spurred Kona/Ka‘u Councilwoman Brenda Ford to craft a bill requiring a department representative to visit the site of proposed subdivisions.
Ford, who has been outspoken during council and committee meetings about her concerns regarding the Planning Department, said the Missler case in 2012 triggered her to try to create a site inspection requirement.
“Nobody went out and looked at this (property) to see it was filled with ravines,” Ford said, referring to the Waikakuu Ranch property that developers wanted to put a planned unit development on. The ravines were deep and more than 100 feet wide in some places, and not appropriate for the proposed development, she said.
Further, plan reviewers failed to note the presence of endangered trees and plants, and that the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat fed on the property, Ford said.
That’s not unusual, she added.
“(The Planning Department) just rubberstamps whatever the developer asks for,” Ford said. “I’m just fed up with the whole routine we go through to accommodate developers. … The developers laugh all the way to the bank at how stupid Hawaii County is.”
When developers are granted certain exemptions — say if they are allowed to develop a subdivision with just catchment water tanks, as happened recently in Ka‘u — the county ends up being asked to pick up the tab later to bring those subdivisions up to code, Ford said.
Ford said she’s also worried about the Planning Department and county officials hiding information from the public.
“It’s not fair to the public or the future owners of the units,” she said.
The council’s Planning Committee sent the measure, Bill 182, to the county’s two planning commissions in January. The Leeward Planning Commission is scheduled to consider the bill at 9:30 a.m. Thursday at the West Hawaii Civic Center.
Planning Director Duane Kanuha recommended the commissioners send the bill back to the council with an unfavorable recommendation.
“To require a site inspection for every application is not a practical use of staff time,” Kanuha’s recommendation report said. “Simple consolidation or small lot subdivisions may not require an inspection.”
In 2013, the Planning Department reviewed 107 subdivisions and 31 consolidations, the report said.
“With the current upswing in our economy, we anticipate that subdivision applications will continue to increase,” the report said.
The department relies on the applicant to provide accurate plat maps, the report said, and the council could consider requiring a licensed engineer or surveyor to prepare both the preliminary and final plat maps. That would require an amendment to the subdivision code, the report said.
Ford said she was not surprised to learn the department opposed the bill.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.