Washington promises to fix VA but overhaul won’t be easy
WASHINGTON — Eric Shinseki has been pushed out as the secretary of veterans affairs. The president vows changes. The Senate is moving with uncharacteristic speed toward a bipartisan response.
But fixing the sprawling agency with an entrenched bureaucracy won’t be easy.
It has a management culture marred by cronyism, intimidation and poor oversight from the Department of Veterans Affairs central office. It has a performance-based bonus system that rewards those who falsify records to meet unrealistic quotas. And it simultaneously penalizes supervisors who don’t push their employees to “cook the books.”
“If you weren’t going to crack people’s heads, if you didn’t put people’s feet to the fire, they didn’t want you around,” said Charleston Ausby, a Marine Corps veteran from Sugar Land, Texas, who worked as a VA service representative from 2002 to 2012.
Ausby said he and his co-workers routinely came under pressure to reduce the VA’s record disability-claims backlog by misfiling or mislabeling old claims that had been pending for years to make them appear in the computer system as though they were new claims.
Like “cooking the books” at VA hospitals to conceal delays in medical care, the practice of manipulating claims data made it seem as though veterans weren’t waiting as long for decisions on their benefits as they really were, Ausby said.
Most underlings are too demoralized to complain or don’t know how to do so without risking retribution, he said.
Falsifying data isn’t a new phenomenon at VA, said Gerald Manar, who worked as an adjudication manager at the VA for 30 years before becoming the national veterans service deputy director for Veterans of Foreign Wars.
VA managers are reluctant to ask for more money and the staff they need to meet quotas because they don’t think their requests will go over well with higher-ups in Washington or politicians in Congress, Manar said.
“The attitude among managers is, ‘Why even bother asking, because we’re not going to get it,’” Manar said. “When you have that kind of culture, you feel so beaten down, so restricted, so disheartened by what’s happened before that you don’t even ask for what you need.”
Some VA employees resort to hiding the problem. As a result, politicians, the public and officials at the VA central office don’t get an accurate picture of what’s wrong from people in the field.
“In a bureaucracy when people are given orders to do things that can’t possibly be done, they become cynical,” said Ronald Abrams, a former VA official who is the joint executive director of the National Veterans Legal Services Program.
“For example, years and years ago I read that the post office made a rule that all mail coming in on Monday had to get out on Monday, otherwise people would lose their jobs … so in Pennsylvania employees rented a trailer and simply threw the letters into a trailer,” Abrams said.
“When the VA said, ‘OK we have to get all these appointments scheduled within 14 days,’ the cynical employees said, ‘We can’t possibly do that.’”
A new test is whether the massive agency needs to grow even more to accommodate a booming veterans population or whether it’s an outmoded model that should be re-imagined to simplify veterans’ benefits applications and give them more access to private care.
A compromise bill crafted by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Bernard Sanders, a Vermont independent, aims to strike a balance between expansion and privatization.
It would allow veterans who live far from VA facilities or can’t get timely VA appointments to seek care from any doctor in the Medicare program, at federally qualified health centers, facilities funded by the Department of Defense or Indian health centers.
The bill would authorize the VA to lease 26 new health facilities and would allot $500 million in unobligated VA funds to hire more doctors and nurses.
Another provision in the bill would allow the VA secretary to demote or fire senior agency officials based on their performance. Unlike a similar bill that passed last month in the House of Representatives, this version doesn’t remove the right of poor-performing officials to appeal their terminations, but it expedites the process from 120 days to just three weeks, and withholds their pay until the appeal is resolved.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.