HONOLULU — Honolulu attorneys may represent both the city and three police officers in a civil lawsuit by the family of a 16-year-old boy shot and killed by police, a judge ruled Friday in response to a motion by the teen’s relatives arguing the officers need to have their own lawyers to avoid conflicts of interest.
HONOLULU — Honolulu attorneys may represent both the city and three police officers in a civil lawsuit by the family of a 16-year-old boy shot and killed by police, a judge ruled Friday in response to a motion by the teen’s relatives arguing the officers need to have their own lawyers to avoid conflicts of interest.
Honolulu police shot Iremamber Sykap after he led officers on a high-speed chase and refused commands to stop. Honolulu prosecutors filed murder and attempted murder charges against three officers after a grand jury declined to indict them, but a judge found there was no probable cause to support the charges.
Sykap’s grandmother and mother filed a civil lawsuit against the city and the officers.
Their attorney, Eric Seitz, objected to allowing the same attorney to represent the city and the officers.
If the officers are ordered to pay punitive damages, the city wouldn’t be liable for that money, presenting a conflict of interest, Seitz said. The city and the officers could have different interests during settlement talks, he said.
“There are many levels of conflicts here,” he said.
Seitz said he wants to ensure early in the process that all the parties are properly represented. Sykap’s family doesn’t want to go through a trial and later have the officers ask for a new one because they were unsatisfied with the representation they received, Seitz said.
Deputy Honolulu Corporation Counsel Derek Mayeshiro said the officers signed waivers consenting to be represented by the city.
“At this time, the city is fully defending the officers and the city,” he said. “We are defending the officers vigorously in this case.”
