State rules out tiger in shark attack at A-Bay

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

Personnel from the DLNR Division of Aquatic Resources, in consultation with the former director of the International Shark Attack File, have ruled out a tiger shark as having been involved in Tuesday’s incident at Anaehoomalu Bay on Hawaii Island, in which a California woman was bitten on her leg.

It’s believed the shark was probably a Galapagos shark, 6-8 feet long, but a definitive determination can’t be made because it’s difficult to distinguish what are known as requiem sharks based solely on injuries, the DLNR said in a press release.

The term requiem shark is now used on the state shark website to refer to any unidentified member of the Carcharhinidae family of sharks, except tiger sharks. These include Galapagos, blacktip, blacktip reef, gray reef, whitetip reef, and sandbar sharks.

In addition, only shark encounters that involve someone being injured are listed, not when a shark bites a board or boat. A previous incident at Anaehoomalu Bay on March 26 has therefore been removed from the list, as analysis of the evidence suggests that the person involved was not bitten by the shark.