Letters to the Editor: June 27, 2022

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

It’s up to us to reform the Supreme Court

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that we have to have nine Supreme Court justices. Nor would it require a Constitutional amendment to add more seats. In fact, Congress has expanded the Supreme Court five times throughout American history.

Congress should use its constitutional authority to re-balance the Supreme Court, which has been taken over by a super-majority that holds extreme views outside of the mainstream of legal thought and out of step with most Americans. That’s why Congress must pass the Judiciary Act, which would add four seats to the Supreme Court and help stem the right-wing super-majority’s attacks on our fundamental freedoms, including the right to access abortion care.

There’s nothing stopping Congress from adding justices — except for the political will to do it, of course. In fact, recent polling showed that the majority of the American voters they represent support expanding the court. That’s why I’m urging Congress to pass to support the Judiciary Act of 2021 and add four seats to the Supreme Court. It is time for the majority to rule over the minority.

Alan Clark

Kailua-Kona

^

Heartless comparison

Dave Chrisman in his letter “Ironic” published June 19 equates children killed senselessly by guns used by “gun nuts” depicted in a political cartoon to aborted fetuses. This is appallingly heartless. The children at Uvalde were actual sentient, thinking, communicating, loving, loved, dreaming, achieving, playing, learning, laughing, crying humans. The comparison of these and many other children killed by gun violence to aborted fetuses is not even remotely close.

Diane Aoki

Kealakekua

^

Allegations don’t hold water

Mr. Mark Van Pernis’s letter advocating for a new hospital in North Kona contained inaccurate statements regarding why the new Kona courthouse was relocated. The original site that was across from West Hawaii Civic Center would’ve made perfect sense, but there was environmental issues which precluded construction.

The USFWS was slated to designate this property as a critical habitat. They had already found the endangered Uhiuhi tree on this property also. Mr. Van Pernis alleges Queen Liliuokalani Trust used their political muscle to push the Judiciary to relocate the new courthouse. QLT wanted improve commercial viability of their properties, but there is a problem with this argument. QLT had developed Kona Commons and Makalapua Center in that same area.

As a result, Mr. Van Pernis’s allegations don’t hold water. The site selection change for the new Kona Courthouse was done purely because of environmental issues with the originally selected site.

Aaron Stene

Kailua-Kona

^

What’s next Clarence Thomas?

Thanks to Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump we now have a Supreme Court that allows the protesters surrounding abortion clinics to carry concealed weapons. What’s next?

Burt Masters

Kailua-Kona

^

Tell us about it

Do you have a story idea or news tip? Is there a community problem that has not been addressed? Do you know someone unique, whose story should be shared and enjoyed with the rest of the community? We want to know. Call the West Hawaii Today newsroom at (808) 930-8600 or email news@westhawaiitoday.com and share the information with our readers.

Letters policy

Letters to the editor should be 300 words or less and will be edited for style and grammar. Longer viewpoint guest columns may not exceed 800 words. Submit online at https://www.westhawaiitoday.com/letter-to-the-editor/ or address letters to:

Editor | West Hawaii Today

PO Box 789

Kailua-Kona, HI 96745

Email: letters@westhawaiitoday.com