Council advances tax increase, but with negative recommendation

  • Mayor Harry Kim, right, presents a proposed general excise tax hike to the County Council Finance Committee on Tuesday in Hilo. (Nancy Cook Lauer/West Hawaii Today)

HILO — After months of talking stink about a general excise tax increase, Mayor Harry Kim on Tuesday asked the County Council to approve it.

“I support this because of a limited choice,” Kim told the council Finance Committee. “I have no other choice except this on the table.”


The committee liked the tax hike even less, voting 3-6 to forward Bill 102 with a negative recommendation to the council for the first of two required hearings. The state law giving the county permission to raise the tax requires a public hearing as well.

The bill puts a one-half percent local surcharge — a half-penny on the dollar — on the state GET, which is currently 4 percent. The county has until March 31 to approve the tax, under the state law.

In a discussion that stretched over five hours, council members chafed at the short timeline they had to explain the need for more revenues and get input from constituents.

Council Chairwoman Valerie Poindexter said her constituents are upset. She said news of across-the-board raises for rank-and-file staff and top officials didn’t improve their mood.

“Here is the government, here is the beast, and we keep feeding the beast. How do we start living within our means?” she asked. “We raised the fuel tax, we said we’re gonna do this, we’re gonna do that, and people haven’t seen anything. … This is so unfair to the people.”

Hilo Councilman Aaron Chung, Hilo Councilwoman Sue Lee Loy and Puna Councilwoman Eileen O’Hara favored the tax as a way to diversify the county’s revenue sources and put some of the tax burden on tourists.

Kim said he looked more favorably on a half-percent GET surcharge after learning from the state that tourists would pay anywhere from 30 to 40 percent, or maybe even more, of the tax. Adding the surcharge would raise about $25 million annually, he said.

If approved after the public hearing and two council hearings, the tax hike would go into effect Jan. 1 and continue until it automatically expires Dec. 31, 2030.

Depending on the final property evaluations currently underway, the county is about $8 million short as it puts together a budget that’s due to the council March 1. Without the GET increase or some other revenue source, the county will have to cut services, Finance Director Deanna Sako said.

“We have cut our costs, we have trimmed our budgets, we have asked our departments to make do with less,” said Sako.

The GET surcharge can be used only for operating or capital costs for public transportation systems, including public roadways or highways, public buses, trains, ferries, pedestrian paths or sidewalks or bicycle paths.

But because the county currently pays for some of those projects partially through its general fund — paid by property taxes — the extra money could free up money in the general fund for other expenses.

Other council members wanted to see a list of projects that would be paid for with the new money.

“This council said loud and clear, we’re not going to give blank checks,” said Kona Councilman Dru Kanuha. “It’s hard for me to give one vote for a blank check right now.”

Kohala Councilman Tim Richards unsuccessfully proposed an amendment reducing both the fuel tax and property taxes that the council raised last year by at least 10 percent. That would result in a net status quo of tax revenue, but from different sources.

“I think they would support an increase if there was a decrease somewhere else,” Richards said.

The committee unanimously approved an amendment by O’Hara recommending any money saved from the general fund go for enhanced police protection.

At least one council member would rather see the property tax hikes than a GET surcharge.

“The more equitable way to raise funds would be to tax those who can most afford it,” said Puna Councilwoman Jen Ruggles, who targeted hotels and resorts, second homes and businesses as possible revenue sources through higher property taxes. “We do have a lot of wealth on this island and we need to be taxing those who can afford it.”

About 30 people sent in written testimony, the majority of it form letters praising the increase as a way to promote “Complete Streets, Safe Routes to School and other improvements that would support active transportation options, such as walking and biking,” many of the letters said. Another three testifiers said they’d support it if food, medical services and drugs were exempted.

All of that boils down to, “We gotta do this, we gotta do this, but no money,” said Carol Ignacio, representing the Blue Zones Project.

Several of the four people testifying in person in support of the tax pointed to the need to fix the county’s struggling Hele-On bus system.

“The bottom line is, we will all survive a half-percent increase with very little notice,” said Patti Pinto.

Pahoa resident James Weatherford said the new money should require “extraordinary oversight” from officials. He said the county needs to fix the bus system.

“What we call Hele-On has been an abject failure,” Weatherford said.

Hilo Realtor Mary Begier said she still had a lot of questions she hoped the administration could answer. It all boils down to trust, she said. She noted the 2030 sunset date in the bill, asking if the tax increase would actually expire then.

“Can you show me a temporary tax?” Begier asked. “Is there any tax we ever turn off?”


Three people sent in written testimony opposing the increase and one spoke against it.

“We just had two tax increases this past year,” said Michael Wilson of Captain Cook. “The cost of living is already very high. … That’s like increasing the cost of living a half percent.”

  1. Buds4All February 7, 2018 4:41 am

    Confucius say Kim One JackOLanternA$$

  2. Scooby February 7, 2018 6:37 am

    Notice how Sako sits there and defends the GET tax raise due to lack of funds? Just a few months ago she went in front of the Salary Commission and said there was more than enough funds to give herself, Harry Kim and all his old lazy staff an enormous undeserving RAISE? Time to fight back and get this loser and his staff OUT!

  3. Ah Cmon! February 7, 2018 7:22 am

    Ah Cmon! This Council is a bunch of blowhards, whining about how “its not fair”, pointing fingers at one another and getting absolutely nothing done. A Mass Transit master plan that was presented last month to the Council, but they have absolutely no way of funding it. Good job dum dums! Now the master plan, which everyone found had a positive net effect, will be shelved and get covered with dust because there is no means of paying for the plan.

  4. Big ideas February 7, 2018 7:45 am

    How about pushing a cost reduction package along with it ?? !!

    1. Ah Cmon! February 7, 2018 8:13 am

      They practice the opposite, with increased taxes (fuel and real property) and increased spending. I understand that at least two council members are going to the phillipines tomorrow. With their 20k pay increases, GET window closing, and the budget review pending, this is NOT a good time to go tripping all over the pacific. Sends the wrong message.

      1. Big ideas February 9, 2018 12:50 pm

        Yeah but they gotta see family…you don’t expect them to pay for it themselves do you?

    2. Rusty Da Clown February 7, 2018 10:56 am

      You right, Big Ideas. Show us how you gonna be more responsible, not just ask for a blank check like Dru Kanuha said.

      1. Big ideas February 9, 2018 12:49 pm

        Dump the County band….use canned music

  5. KonaRich February 7, 2018 8:18 am

    So Kim feels better about the raise in GET because 30 maybe 40% would come from tourists, well how about the other 60 or maybe 70% of rest of us. I am as sure as the sun will come up tomorrow, my property value will go up and my taxes too. GET tax raise hurt the struggling working class the most, so Hilo council members Chung, Lee Loy and Puna council O’hara vote for it. Unbelievable!!


    1. onceawarrior February 7, 2018 10:40 pm

      Yes on GET increase.
      Also, make all real property owners PAY fairly.

      1. 4whatitsworth February 8, 2018 9:54 am

        Most of the time when I hear this “fair share” argument it is from someone who gets their money from the government so “fair” is simply more money for them.

        Example: “Fair share” for the current Kim administration was to raise property taxes 10% and gas taxes a 100% then give themselves 30% raises.

        Now the proposal to raise excise tax 12.5% and in all likelihood most of this money will be used to line the pockets of these fair minded individuals who work for and get their money from the government. Unfortunately there will be no real public benefit.

  6. metalman808 February 7, 2018 10:11 am

    Impeach Harry. He is definitely NOT for the people anymore. Old man is losing his mind. How could someone become so greedy after his campaign of let’s put trust back into the government. I’m starting to miss Billy Kenoi. Remember Billy didn’t want his raise because he knew so many big islanders were struggling financially. At least Billy had heart for his people.

    1. Rusty Da Clown February 7, 2018 10:55 am

      It’s just like last time Harry was mayor – raise taxes, spend more money, raise taxes, spend more money. Billy had to cut cut cut to get back to a county government we could afford. Now Harry is running it up again.

  7. Rusty Da Clown February 7, 2018 10:54 am

    Tax increases that pay for something meaningful can be OK. But hello, Harry Kim – you just increased property tax and fuel tax, and now you’re asking for more without showing how you’re gonna be responsible with it? Like a little kid asking for more allowance. Show me you gonna work for it, Harry. Not just contract all your cronies and give yourself a raise.

    1. Scooby February 7, 2018 11:42 am

      Harry doesn’t know how to run government efficiently, all he knows is spend and grow government and place blame with everyone else but himself. He took over as Mayor over a year ago and he’s still looking to place blame on everyone instead of fixing problems. He talks and talks and talks but nothing ever gets done. If he raises the GET the first thing he’ll do is hire one of his old friends on contract at probably $12,000 per month as a GET consultant.

    2. 4whatitsworth February 7, 2018 11:45 am

      Notice how rolling back the increase in fuel tax was not discussed as part of this increase. There will never be enough of other people money for these clowns.

  8. diverdave February 7, 2018 12:29 pm

    Spend and tax. Spend and tax.
    And they always say, “there is NO other way”.

    What goes up and never comes down in this County?
    Your age and taxes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Star-Advertiser's TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email