Officer suspected of stealing drug evidence

  • Mitch Roth
  • Hawaii County Police Chief Paul Ferreira.

KAILUA-KONA — Hawaii County police released information about an investigation into missing drug evidence and identified a former police officer as a person of interest, but have no further comment.

“As stated in the media release this is still an open investigation, therefore, no additional comments will be made by me or my staff,” Hawaii County Police Chief Paul K. Ferreira stated in an email Thursday afternoon.


The case was forwarded to the Hawaii County Prosecutor’s Office on March 2 for a review of possible charges.

“We’re determining whether to keep it here or if we have any conflicts,” said County Prosecutor Mitch Roth.

If a conflict of interest is determined, Roth said, the case would be forwarded to the Department of the Attorney General, where it could be prosecuted or assigned to a prosecutor’s office in another county.

A press release regarding the criminal and administrative investigations was posted on the police department’s website Thursday morning. It indicated that in October 2017, cocaine recovered as evidence in 2014 was found to be lighter than reported during its initial recovery.

The release states the discrepancy was discovered when the evidence was being weighed in preparation to utilize a small quantity of the drug for training purposes, police said.

“The investigation quickly identified a sworn employee as being a person of interest for the missing portions of the drug,” according to the release.

Police spokesman Alan Richmond explained a sworn employee is a police officer. The former officer’s rank or years of service were not disclosed. The officer’s identity was also not released, nor was the amount of drugs missing.

In an interview on Hawaii Public Radio, Ferreira said the officer held the rank of detective.

At the time of the investigation, the release indicates, the officer was immediately placed on administrative leave without pay. Audits of other evidence recovered by the officer revealed “other anomalies, which revealed cases whereby there was a weight discrepancy in marijuana concentrate, (hashish), from two separate investigations.”

The investigations from which the evidence came had been suspended because there were no suspects.

The officer has since retired from the department. Roth said he believed the individual retired this year; however, it could have been at the end of 2017. Roth didn’t know if the former employee was receiving retirement benefits.

In November, the police department said it was expecting up to 20 upcoming retirements, eight of which were ranking officers.

Although it has been five months since the initial investigation, Roth said, he thought the release of information was rather quick.

“I think the police chief has done everything to be as transparent as possible,” he said.

From what he saw, Roth added, the investigation was in-depth. The report filed with the prosecutor’s office was pages long.

“You could tell a lot of hours went into it,” he said.

Since the investigation began, the release states, the department has tightened up procedures in order to ensure a similar scenario isn’t repeated.

“The department has also conducted additional audits to ensure these incidents have not also been perpetrated by anyone else,” the release states.

Neither the state Legislature nor Legislative Reference Bureau had received the annual Misconduct Report from Hawaii County as of Thursday.

The Maui, Kauai and Honolulu police departments submitted their reports ahead of the deadline. Those reports are available on the state Legislature’s website for review.

Hawaii Revised Statutes require the chief of each county police department submit to the Legislature no later than Jan. 31 an annual report of misconduct incidents that resulted in suspension or discharge of an officer during the calendar year prior, from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31.

In its Jan. 19 meeting in Kailua-Kona, the Hawaii County Police Commission got correspondence regarding the report from the police chief, but did not discuss the matter.


During the meeting’s Police Chief’s Report on Department Activities, according to the minutes posted online, Deputy Chief Kenneth Bugado Jr. told the commission the report “contained cases that went before ARB. Verbal and written reprimands were not in the report. They did not identify any trends.”

Associated editor Chelsea Jensen contributed to this report.

  1. areapolice March 16, 2018 5:05 am

    This is not the first time evidence went missing. How about the $30,000 that went missing from the evidence room, not that long ago. They didn’t cure the problem then and what makes them think, it’s not going to happen again. I have a suspicion it was the person who was building a new house.

  2. Scooby March 16, 2018 5:44 am

    This stinks, no arrest and allowed to retire?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Star-Advertiser's TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email