WASHINGTON — The U.S. Forest Service needs to hire more firefighters and reconfigure how it mitigates the risk of wildfires that are growing more intense, the head of the agency told lawmakers Wednesday.
This year “has been devastating in not only the size and frequency of large wildfires but also in terms of sustained activity,” U.S. Forest Service Chief Randy Moore testified before the House Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry.
Moore blamed the severity of recent fire seasons on extreme drought, a warming climate and a century of “overly aggressive suppression policies” that have made forests ripe for more destructive fires.
As of Monday, about 46,000 fires have burned nearly 6 million acres across the West this year, destroying 4,500 structures and killing four federal firefighters this year, Moore said.
About 27,000 firefighters have been deployed by the federal government to fight wildfires this year, but they are still stretched thin. The problem reached a critical point this summer when a burst of early wildfires began in the West amid extreme staffing shortages. A combination of low pay, competition from state and local fire departments and exhaustion from longer and more destructive fire seasons has left federal agencies scrambling to fill positions.
“We have seen highly trained personnel leave the Forest Service; we have experienced some inability to recruit new employees; and we are in a constant mode of training new employees,” Moore said in prepared testimony.
The Biden administration this year boosted the minimum wage from $13 to $15 per hour, enabling the federal government to attract firefighters in states like California and Washington where pay was higher.
“Federal wages for firefighters have not kept pace with wages offered by state, local and private entities in some areas of the United States,” Moore said in written testimony. “Firefighters must be fairly paid for the grueling work they are willing to take on.”
Moore told the Los Angeles Times last week that “we’ll never be able to hire enough firefighters to fight our way out of what’s going on on the landscape. We’re seeing conditions out there that I have not seen in my 40-plus years of working for this agency.”
Last year, California recorded its largest fire season ever. The severe impact these fires have on communities is partly because of the historic approach American officials have taken to eliminating fires.
Before Europeans colonized North America, many Western forests benefited from frequent, low-intensity fires caused by lightning and Indigenous burning practices, experts say. Post-colonization, U.S. officials instead aggressively suppressed fires, upending that beneficial cycle, and helped create an imbalance that makes wildfires more dangerous and more intense.
The forest chief told lawmakers that his agency would instead focus on mitigating the impact of wildfires by more aggressively treating forests before fires begin. Such treatments include thinning underbrush and debris, and clearing dead branches and trees to reduce potential fuel for blazes. Moore testified that such treatments near Lake Tahoe helped stymie the spread of the Caldor fire last month, saving homes and lives.
Moore said about 66 million acres need to be treated, but officials could be nearly as effective if they focus on 20 million critical acres over the next decade.
“We must actively treat forests,” he said. “That’s what it takes to turn this system around.”
Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., said West Coast forests are “in a crisis mode” and that there is no longer a fire season, but a fire year. The federal government needs to devote more financial resources to help the agency shift away from fire suppression to prescribed treatments, Costa said.
“If we continue in this way, I don’t think we are ever going to deal with the crisis or provide the forests with the proper management they deserve.”
